Add new skills for TDD, issue management, PRD creation, and productivity tools

- Introduced TDD skills including deep modules, interface design, mocking, refactoring, and testing guidelines.
- Added skills for breaking plans into GitHub issues and creating PRDs from conversation context.
- Implemented productivity skills for scaffolding exercises, setting up pre-commit hooks, and managing notes in Obsidian.
- Created a caveman communication mode for concise technical responses and a grilling technique for thorough plan discussions.
- Developed a skill for writing new agent skills with structured templates and guidelines.
- Included git guardrails to prevent dangerous git commands and a migration guide for using @total-typescript/shoehorn in tests.
This commit is contained in:
Matt Pocock 2026-04-28 09:42:34 +01:00
parent 3e3ca9b9fa
commit 62f43a1817
43 changed files with 97 additions and 65 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
---
name: request-refactor-plan
description: Create a detailed refactor plan with tiny commits via user interview, then file it as a GitHub issue. Use when user wants to plan a refactor, create a refactoring RFC, or break a refactor into safe incremental steps.
---
This skill will be invoked when the user wants to create a refactor request. You should go through the steps below. You may skip steps if you don't consider them necessary.
1. Ask the user for a long, detailed description of the problem they want to solve and any potential ideas for solutions.
2. Explore the repo to verify their assertions and understand the current state of the codebase.
3. Ask whether they have considered other options, and present other options to them.
4. Interview the user about the implementation. Be extremely detailed and thorough.
5. Hammer out the exact scope of the implementation. Work out what you plan to change and what you plan not to change.
6. Look in the codebase to check for test coverage of this area of the codebase. If there is insufficient test coverage, ask the user what their plans for testing are.
7. Break the implementation into a plan of tiny commits. Remember Martin Fowler's advice to "make each refactoring step as small as possible, so that you can always see the program working."
8. Create a GitHub issue with the refactor plan. Use the following template for the issue description:
<refactor-plan-template>
## Problem Statement
The problem that the developer is facing, from the developer's perspective.
## Solution
The solution to the problem, from the developer's perspective.
## Commits
A LONG, detailed implementation plan. Write the plan in plain English, breaking down the implementation into the tiniest commits possible. Each commit should leave the codebase in a working state.
## Decision Document
A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:
- The modules that will be built/modified
- The interfaces of those modules that will be modified
- Technical clarifications from the developer
- Architectural decisions
- Schema changes
- API contracts
- Specific interactions
Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.
## Testing Decisions
A list of testing decisions that were made. Include:
- A description of what makes a good test (only test external behavior, not implementation details)
- Which modules will be tested
- Prior art for the tests (i.e. similar types of tests in the codebase)
## Out of Scope
A description of the things that are out of scope for this refactor.
## Further Notes (optional)
Any further notes about the refactor.
</refactor-plan-template>